Section 2 302 (b) Appreciating Qatil-Umid Evidence An Interesting Witness was a cousin of the prosecution witness, while the other was a cousin of the deceased, but based on his relationship with the deceased, the witnesses could not be interpreted as interested. ? The witnesses, because they had no direct animosity to the accused, who described the statements of the witnesses as a fatal injury, not only supported the medical evidence, but also the pistol from the accused's possession. Was also recovered. Revealed and identified by his home, the firearms expert's positive report reinforced the ocular evidence presented by the prosecution's witnesses, the expert-issued report was brought on record without objection. And if the suspect was not satisfied, he demanded to call the specialist. Under Section 1010, CRPC's provisions, the cross-examination was ironed and the courts considered the witnesses truthful, only on the basis that the medical evidence contradicted the ocular account to reject such credible witness's opinion. Although this was not binding on the court case, the court had to see the opinion expressed by the doctor, if the medical jurisprudence was to be admissible in the light of the principles, statements of the prosecution witnesses regarding the exact location of the case. Based on the contradiction, they have no material significance, their statements cannot be dismissed, especially at the scene of the event. Their presence was beyond any doubt that the accused was absconding with the law and was arrested after a period of two months and the accused could not present a viable explanation for such abduction. Extremely Corrective Price
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
