Section 31, 42 and 54 of the Permanent Order of Revenue Record and the case for their correction, along with the trial, the appellate court also failed to consider both the evidence, which led to the error of the two courts to the plaintiff. Was on the record. In this assumption, the legal and factual positions of the evidence were discussed contrary to the evidence, or the statements that came on the record by the plaintiff were one of those clear cases where the orders of the two courts were not based on any evidence. And the orders were arbitrarily approved. , And these judgments and decrees have resulted in injustice, no doubt, concurrent conclusions, usually in an amended jurisdiction, but, when a court has acted unlawfully, Or with material irregularities and the basis of that decision was no decision. As a result of the evidence or irrefutable evidence, and the injustice, then justice demanded that such a decision be corrected, both courts failed to read the evidence, and the D case / findings were based on any evidence, such as The findings were not exempt from decisions and orders interfered with by the Judge / Trial Court and the Magistrate Noise / Appeal Court, and the plaintiff's case was dismissed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
