Section 5 Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (V 1974), Section 4 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 24 Appointment / Appointment of Employees It was a matter of posting the posts of Planning and Community Development Officers in the advertisement published in the paper. PS17 was shown. , But they were assigned to BPS 16 instead of BPS 17. The representation presented by the appellant to the competent authority in the classification of his positions, which was not considered, was appealed by the appellants to the service tribunal to submit to the lawyer for powers. After accepting Grade BPS 16 at his will, he was formalized, with no protest, the question of waiver and estoppel attracted in his case because of a dispute raised by a lawyer for the authorities. There was no point because there was no balance of bargaining power between the appellants. Authorities and it cannot be accepted that the applicants should continue to comply with the illegal conditions The conditions for indefinite period were required under Section 24A of the General Clause Act 1897 that the employees were fair, just and equitably unemployed. And for fear of being shown the door, he had no choice but to accept his appointment on any terms and to continue. It was offered by the department because there was no reason for the authorities to justify refusing to rate the appellants when the other departments upgraded the employees. Should not be deprived and discriminated against. Planning Officers / Appellants
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
