Definitions of evidence of Sections 9 (c), 20 and 21 were expressly excluded under Section 25 of Section 103, CCPC, and the police officers did not have any ill will or personal conduct against the accused. Direct and credible evidence was presented that police officers could not dispose of marijuana in large quantities from their own resources, and under certain circumstances, under Section 20 and 21 of the Drug Substances Act, 1997 Was not complied with. The accused was illegally convicted of narcotics not from a residential home but from a drug detective who was received after office hours, a search warrant could not be obtained by the CIA investigating the matter as being illegal. Because of this the whole trial could not be heard. The accused of acquitting the Reader of Investigation Officer should not forward the instruction and do not tamper with the recovered drug parcels freely; the delay in sending only for chemical analysis was not in favor of the accused, samples. 264 bars of hashish were pulled, each stick weighing ten grams, as the accused were found in possession of 2640 grams of hashish and were truly punished and sentenced.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
