Claims 8, 39, 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue, Act (XVII of 1967), the possession of section 39 suit, the cancellation of the registered deed, declaration and permanent injunction discriminatory claimant claimed that it was owned by Purchased a suit property through mutation from. And said that the property is in the possession of the defendant's husband because the defendant's tenant died thereafter and his widow / plaintiff was living in the suit property while the plaintiff filed a petition against the widow of the deceased tenant. , Which denied the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. Claimed to be the owner of this property The dismissal request was dismissed, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the deceased plaintiff's widow, the defendant, for property, declaration, etc., claiming that her late husband registered the cell. Purchase of a suit property from the original owner through a deadline. The record revealed that the suit property was in full part that the defendant and the plaintiff's previous offer had never been the owner of the same dissolution. No title was created in favor of the person in whose rights the record was registered. , And this variable's entry cannot be used as a title document. , But the mutation register will create a rebuttal in favor of the person to whom the entry was made, and it is said that the person who challenged this change will be treated as such by the person challenging the entry. The entry can be presented with proof that it is a concept of truth and accuracy associated with the mutation contained in it. According to the property, the claimant's name was rejected from his contents, which he mentioned
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
