SHAH WALI versus QUETTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
Section 21 (4) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 challenges the appeal of the appellate jurisdiction of the High Court of Appeals. Was it provided to them with a copy of the order dated 29th 2009, two days before the appeal was filed, and that the officials of the authority acted negatively with them and there was no delay in filing the present appeal? The order of intentionality neither intentionally nor deliberately by the Authority was marked on the name of an appellant on 29 12 2009, but there was no confirmation that it had when it was ordered. So the service time was the most important because the length of time had to be calculated from the date of service. Given the circumstances, which deprived the High Court, delayed filing of appeal
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
