Article 5 365b Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), a constitution of Pakistan, Article 35 Preventing abduction for marriage for marriage, appellant's protection demanded termination of the FIR on the basis that the prosecution was invalid. And no one had abducted her appellant. The court admits before the Supreme Court that after dissolving her initial marriage, she later married the accused, after which there was a child. The High Court dismissed the FIR filed by the state lawyer against the appellant's husband. Denied that the appellant should appear in the trial court. Applicant's validity statement before the Supreme Court shows that the provisions of section 5 365B, PPC, were not drawn to the court and the ruling was designated in case of dissolution of the marriage. Although, for more than two years, the appellant's ex-husband did not challenge her. Who knew about this, as he was no longer interested in pursuing it, such behavior reflects the quality of his interpretation before the Court of Appeal's admission and his choice? Her marriage to an individual was a constitutional order requiring state prosecutors to appeal the cases and insist that the appellant should appeal before filing an appeal. The pending trial was converted into appeal before the trial court petition
