Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAMEEN versus ABDUL SATTAR NAREJO

Sections 54 and 154 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Capable of Arresting Criminal Justice The accused was involved in a murder case and since he was an influential person, he was not arrested by the police after the incident. , Was elected as the Deputy Councilor of the Union Council and was performing his duties in the capacity of elected representative, but officials are well aware of the suspect's involvement in the murder case, the court was told that the officers who had their Demonstrated action was taken against the hesitation to arrest the victims. The Supreme Court was satisfied that under the command of the Regional Police Officer, the police had taken all necessary steps to arrest the accused and the police were able to arrest him accordingly. After the legal course in the report on record with the remand letter, all the officers had to act as well as what would be the status or status of wrongdoer and no one should think above the law when the accused was arrested. So that law will go its way The application was dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• AIR LEAGUE OF PIAC EMPLOYEES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, M/O. LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC 89
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director-General of Intelligence and Investigation F.B.R., Karachi v. MUHAMMAD JAMAL RIZVI 2012 PTD 90
• Malik ABDUL AZIZ AWAN v. Rana MAQBOOL AHMAD KHAN 2012 SCMR 91
• RIZWANA BIBI v. State 2012 SCMR 94
• AKRAM UL HAQ ALVI v. JOINT SECRETARY (R-II) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 SCMR 106
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamab v. Dr. MUBASHIR HASSAN 2012 PLD 106
• MUSHTAQ v. State 2012 SCMR 109
• SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, REVENUE DEPARTMENT v. SAJJAD AHMAD 2012 SCMR 114

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

best law firms from Mehmood Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes