Find a Lawyer

MALIK ABDUL AZIZ AWAN versus RANA MAQBOOL AHMAD KHAN

Sections 9, 15 and 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 185 (3) and 199 Withdrawal Requirements exclude the tenant's request that the tenancy is not in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of the Punjab Rented Primes Act. The rejection of the leave application by the 2009 Rental Tribunal order dated 191 2010 and the final dismissal order on 16 3 2010, respectively, the tenant's dismissal challenged the order of the vacationer for further leave of dismissal by the Appellate Court and the High Court respectively. Did not On the eve of the appeal filed in the constitutional petition or against the order of dismissal, the Supreme Court refused to grant leave of appeal under the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• Mst. RUBINA BADAR v. LONG LIFE BUILDERS 2012 SCMR 84
• SAEED AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2012 SCMR 89
• AIR LEAGUE OF PIAC EMPLOYEES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, M/O. LABOUR AND MANPOWER DIVISION ISLAMABAD 2012 PLC 89
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director-General of Intelligence and Investigation F.B.R., Karachi v. MUHAMMAD JAMAL RIZVI 2012 PTD 90
• RIZWANA BIBI v. State 2012 SCMR 94
• MUHAMMAD YAMEEN v. ABDUL SATTAR NAREJO 2012 SCMR 101
• AKRAM UL HAQ ALVI v. JOINT SECRETARY (R-II) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2012 SCMR 106
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamab v. Dr. MUBASHIR HASSAN 2012 PLD 106

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

list of supreme court advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes