O VII, R 11 Reject Plaintiff's Opinion O VII, the main theme for the dismissal of the investigation under R 11, was the plaintiff's material, based on the strange facts of the CPC case, some controversial or recognized material, The available documents, which can be considered as part of the material intake, as to the nature of the material's movements, may also be considered. In the present case, on the definition of the plaintiff's proceedings and the documents attached thereto, it cannot be concluded. That the plaintiffs have nothing. The cause of action, or the case was withheld by law The claimant claimed several remedies in his claim clause. If no one could offer prayers, it would not mean that all other claimants under the lawsuit The trial will be banned for treatment. VII, R 11, CPC plaintiffs can be dismissed only if all relief claims were made, they were withheld under the law, the claimant dismissed if some of the claimed relief was available. Can't be done, because the unconstitutional provisions under C were no concept of refusal of the plaintiffs to be fragmented in this case, it was a variation of the matter of fact, which cannot be resolved without recording the evidence. In such a case, the plaintiff's dismissal could not be justified, provided the powers that be, partially or wholly, after the matters were settled. Legal matters can be settled and settled completely, dismissing the plaintiff without the opportunity to formulate a case or a hearing is not permissible, and after presenting evidence to the parties, the strange facts and circumstances of the case , Q of any kind
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
