SYED RIAZ-UL-HASSAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY MUZAFFARABAD
The R9 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Articles 42 and 44 of the Promotion Jurisdiction High Court scope Appellant, which was initially incorporated in the Department of Education as Librarian B16, later Grade B was given 17 and was transferred to a National Library in place J for a period of 6 months and through another notification he was permanently appointed by the transfer to the Transfer Library when Deputy Director BP. When the post of S18 was vacated in the transfer library, the appellant claimed to have promoted it. The post of Deputy Director Case of the Appellant was not considered and he filed a writ petition which was also rejected by the High Court affirmation. According to the rules, the deputy director of BPS-18 based on selection of merit from the librarians. The post was to be filled by publicity. BPS 17, five years of service and the Appellant fulfilled all the required conditions. The High Court had dismissed the writ petition on the sole basis that the order of appointment of the Appellant in the Transfer Library was issued without the recommendation of the concerned Selection Board officials, no document was kept on record. When the Appellant's Promotion Issue was considered and resolved by the authorities, when the authorities failed to resolve the issue relating to the terms and conditions of a public servant, the High Court, in appropriate cases, in the absence of any other appropriate remedy. , Can do. May instruct the authorities to decide, in no way did the appellant approach the High Court for the implementation of the notification, under which it
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
