MUHAMMAD IRSHAD KHAN versus PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 42 (12) Civil Service Appointment The Public Service Commission examines the appointment of civil judges applicants who competed for appointment, and failed to qualify for the written test, for checking and remarking of answer books. Appeals Public Service Commission Denies Re-Checking and Remarks Respondents allege that the denial was abusive, violated its instructions and was discriminatory as similar instructions were found in various autonomous institutions, such as universities. The request was made by the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education High Court Writ petition filed by the Czar rejected. Controversial decision Petitioner failed to prove his argument with respect to any legal provision Boards and Universities had their own rules and regulations, while the Public Service Commission was a wholly independent body unless it was exclusively Was not provided. Amend by any law that any other law shall attract or enforce the provision of the paramilitary, nor shall any entity or legal person be obliged to follow the procedure or procedure of any other institution. Whereby the applicant's application can be made without any specific express argument about the lawyer. That the criteria set forth for the paperwork of universities and boards were applicable to the Public Service Commission, without any reference to the High Court having written a definitive verdict after appreciating every aspect of the case and keeping the legal precedent. Failed to identify the petition. Any violation of legal clauses or n
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
