SARDAR KHURSHID HUSSAIN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 47 Civil Service Retirement Conflict Date of Birth Date Applicant who retired under notification of age, challenged retirement notification stating that his date of birth incorrectly served him As it is listed in the book. The basis on which the applicant retired from service was in 1952, while the applicant claimed his birth date as the applicant served more than 40 years in the police department in 1951. , But did not timely request your date corrected. As a birth applicant, he himself applied for the issuance of a fake copy of the Matriculation Certificate and upon his request, the Board of Education confirmed his date of birth, 1955 1952, as the applicant had the competent authority. Had raised a dispute about the correction of his date of birth. Less than a month before retirement, the applicant, according to the latest confirmation issued by the Board of Education, was the date of birth 15 1 1952, and this certificate was issued after the inquiry until the Board of Education No contradiction is drawn from the record, not brought to the record, as the most relevant and competent authority / institution cannot be neglected. If the Board considers the applicant's date of birth to be valid on 15th 1956, his / her recruitment / enrollment in his department will be at the age of 15, while in accordance with the legal provisions, no person has been employed. May be found to be less than 18 years old, service turbo
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
