Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMMIR SOHAIL versus RETURNING OFFICER (PP-20)


Appellant's approval of the nomination papers of Articles 12 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63 denied the defendant's acceptance of nomination papers on the basis that the defendant had announced the passing of intermediate education in the elections in 1996. In the current year, however, it declared itself to be matriculated, and was therefore not cohesive, righteous, honest, and amenable to Article 62 (1) (f) of the Constitution. In connection with the allegations leveled against him, the appellant also failed to show that a court order against the defendant failed to show that the retiring officer had exercised the maximum jurisdiction or passed a decree. The crooked appeal was dismissed, in the circumstances \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Mailsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.