Find a Lawyer

ATTA UL MUSTIFA JAMIL versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER

Sections 12 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 and 63, the appellant reversed the order under which the Returning Officer accepted the nomination of the respondent's papers. And concealed facts and information regarding his assets. According to the obligations and the information available to the State Bank of Pakistan, the defendant was a plaintiff and the High Court sought the report from the Regional Office of the State Bank of Pakistan, and the Chief Manager of the State Bank of Pakistan submitted a certificate. The court stated that the defendant had returned the entire amount before submitting his papers which stated that the candidates' case on Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution was not affected by the certificate, the appeal was dismissed. Done

Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2013

• SAQIB NASEEB v. RETURNING OFFICER, PP-226, SAHIWAL VII 2013 CLC 1024
• SHAHID ORAKZAI v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-52, RAWALPINDI 2013 CLC 1177
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. RETURNING OFFICER, CONSTITUENCY NO.NA-95/DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2013 CLC 1193
• MUBASHIR KAMAL ABBASI v. RETUNRING OFFICER (NA-50) DISTRICT RAWALPINDI 2013 CLC 1230
• USMAN IBRAHIM v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-95 GUJRANWALA-I 2013 CLC 1521
• NADEEM KHADIM v. RETURNING OFFICER, PP-26, JHELUM-III 2013 CLC 1653
• AMMIR SOHAIL v. RETURNING OFFICER (PP-20) 2013 CLC 1667
• RIZWAN ZOUQ v. RETURNING OFFICERS NA-162 SWL-III, SAHIWAL 2013 CLC 271

All Election Tribunal Punjab judgments of 2013 →

us immigration advocates from Mandra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes