Section (78 ()) (d) Election Petition The evidence against the victorious candidate (defendant) obtained through proof of alleged qualification / degree was alleged that he had obtained a Bachelor of Arts (B) from a university. A) had a degree and arranged for someone else. The woman should sit in her place for the examination, and for this reason it was necessary for the applicant to declare her selection void, that during her examination the winning candidate did not remember the contents of the articles and articles submitted. Kriska. That he studied to take the exam, which proved that someone else was sitting in his place during the exam. That he did not remember exactly what books he had read and the number in which papers. His picture on the admission form and roll number slip was not his photograph but that of another woman, and his signature on the admission / registration form was different from his signature on the other documents, which were specific to the applicant. The present application of the allegation was that there was neither a request form nor a registration record nor any other record in which it appears that the winning candidate was actually sitting on the exam. Thus, he obtained a fake and fake degree. , And this record, if any, is available to the University. The winner was wrongly created under the indirect and illegal influence of the candidate's husband, during the trial the applicant forged the record and in the case of duplication of the absence of the application form and registration record. Changed your position. Before this, through an application
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2013
