Find a Lawyer

MUBASHIR KAMAL ABBASI versus RETUNRING OFFICER (NA-50) DISTRICT RAWALPINDI

Sections 14 (5) and 99 constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 (1) (E) and 63 (1) (K) nomination papers of the Scrutiny Disqualification Service of Pakistan or the Legal Institution Respondent Infrastructure Project Development Flyty (IPDF) Was a consultant and resigned. A few weeks before the submission of the papers, the government responded to the legality of corporate body service in wholly owned and controlled, and not two years had passed since I resigned as IPDF adviser. Were. The defendant's candidate was affected by the provisions of Article 62 (1) (e). The constituent respondent's Article (((1) (k)) was unable to be elected or elected as a member of the Parliamentary Election Tribunal and to remove the name of the respondent from the list of legitimate nominees in the respective constituency. Directed and rejected. Nomination papers were allowed under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2013

• Mian SAIF-UR-REHMAN JOIYA v. RETURNING OFFICER PP-226, SAHIWAL-VII, SAHIWAL 2013 CLC 1017
• SAQIB NASEEB v. RETURNING OFFICER, PP-226, SAHIWAL VII 2013 CLC 1024
• SHAHID ORAKZAI v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-52, RAWALPINDI 2013 CLC 1177
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. RETURNING OFFICER, CONSTITUENCY NO.NA-95/DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA 2013 CLC 1193
• ATTA UL MUSTIFA JAMIL v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER 2013 CLC 1439
• USMAN IBRAHIM v. RETURNING OFFICER NA-95 GUJRANWALA-I 2013 CLC 1521
• NADEEM KHADIM v. RETURNING OFFICER, PP-26, JHELUM-III 2013 CLC 1653
• AMMIR SOHAIL v. RETURNING OFFICER (PP-20) 2013 CLC 1667

All Election Tribunal Punjab judgments of 2013 →

pakistani advocates Burewala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes