RIZWAN ZOUQ versus RETURNING OFFICERS NA-162 SWL-III, SAHIWAL
Sections 7, 11, 14 (3), 57, 99 and 100 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 62 (1) (F), 63 (1) (C) and 224 Election Appeal Nomination Papers, Disqualification Approval Respondent Member National Assembly but he was disqualified by the Supreme Court on charges of dual citizenship, so his seat was vacated by respondents once again announcing the submission of his papers that he was not citizens of any other country. And the Returning Officer approves his nomination papers, the defendant alleges against the nomination papers that he made a false declaration and did not collect the money received during that period. What was the reason for which he was disqualified by the Supreme Court, a refund was ordered and it was not ascertained. Defendant could not be arrested for failing to comply with the order passed by the Returning Officer of the Supreme Court and for the record, acceptance of the defendant's papers, which did not indicate that the defendant was under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution. Is ineligible or related to sections 99 and 100 of the Public Representation Act 1976, or has been declared by someone to be a courteous, virtuous, non-profit, honest and amiable and who has disqualified the Supreme Court Did not comply with the orders passed by, if any, allegations made by the respondents after the evidence was prepared Pending the election tribunal appointed by the Commission may be considered. 57 of the Representation People Act 1976 did not violate the decision passed by the Returning Officer in the Election Petition nor did they have to perform their duties under Sections 7 and 14 of the Public Representation Act 1976 and
Related judgments — Election Tribunal Punjab, 2013
