Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161/34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) in relation to public works concerning public servants, general intentions, criminal mismanagement trials In addition to legal compensation, the state-of-the-art government employee recommended the police report / challan scope report submitted under section 737373. The trial court disagreed with the report and directed to present the final charge sheet. The final report by the trial court disagreed with the report under section 73, 73, CRPC, and took serious action against the accused. The accused claimed that the present case was registered without any net action and no permission or permission was obtained from any authorized authority to furnish the challan. Accreditation was not binding on the report submitted by the police under the trial court section 173, CR PC and may also have been done by the investigating officer who was appointed to supervise the proceedings of the Judicial Magistrate and accordingly obtained permission from the authorized authority. The complainant and the adviser regarding the acquisition could not agree with the objection that the disclosed officer had not picked up the challan before reaching the spot. For the first time before the High Court, when the trial court's order was declared concrete, there was no irregularity or illegality in the order passed by the trial court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
