Section 302 (b) criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), benefit of doubt on the testimony of Section 103 QTL MD evidence, was convicted on the basis of a statement of guilt convicted on motivation and after trial Sentenced to convict Qt. Two different versions of Amad Valdetti were adopted by the prosecution; the first motive for the murder was that he had developed illicit relations with his wife as the victim's uncle and when the accused found him in a questionable state. He was charged with murder but his wife escaped and the accused was not examined by the wife prosecutor to support the cause. It was revealed by prosecution witnesses that there was a criminal case prior to the incident, in which the victim killed a female relative of the accused but nothing was extracted. Both seal / minor witnesses recorded in this regard did not support the presence, arrest and recovery of counsel. Section 103, CRPC was also not complied with because the police did not observe the recovery, arrest and location of the incident area etc. Even one suspicion was sufficient to benefit the accused, in order to increase the benefit of the doubt, it was not necessary that there should be many situations in which doubt arose, and if there was one case that the accused was If a reasonable doubt can be raised in the sensible mind about the crime of, then the accused was entitled to take advantage not as a matter of grace but as a right of High Court. The accused was acquitted after being tried and punished, because the prosecution decided the case.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
