Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 497 Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Concession Cards (XLV of 1860), Section 395 Haraba, Dacoity Bail, denied the charges against the accused and accomplices. I was not named in the suspect, but after that the identity parade revealed the recovery of the looted property along with his specific role. The special possession of the accused came under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, all the CCPC prosecution witnesses involved the accused in their statements under Section 161, the CRP bail pleas were denied. I

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• HASSAN FARID KHAN v. State 2013 YLR 219
• MATLOOB HUSSAIN v. Mst. ZUBAIDA 2013 MLD 219
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHATTAK v. State 2013 PLD 220
• DOULAT v. State 2013 PLD 223
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. RAJO KHANANI, DISTRICT BADIN 2013 PLD 232
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN KATIAR v. PAKISTAN REFINERY LTD. 2013 CLD 233
• SALAHUDDIN DHARAJ v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government Department 2013 PLD 236
• ASIF ALI v. State 2013 YLR 237

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

solicitors from Shogram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes