The accused under Section 342 should be asked to propose a complaint to the Sections 342 and 493 Power Trial Court accused, the PC Scope Counselor privately directed the trial court in the direction of the Public Prosecutor Scope Complainant / Applicant. Directed to file a petition in front. Under Section 2, under CRPC, the statement should be presented to the accused, as in the opinion of the complainant, the accused was required to sue the piece of evidence against him. During their examination of the accused under section 342, the CCP covered the question suggested by the complainant; under section 342, the CCP had to keep such questions for the trial court while the accused was investigating, In which it was deemed necessary that the question suggested by the complainant cannot be kept. The accused, if the trial court deemed it unnecessary, had the support of the trial court in answer to the complainant's proposed question and concluded that the accused was present before the accused during his examination under Section 342, CCPC. The questions put forth had covered them or else the petition was presented to the trial court under section 342, CRPC for inclusion of the proposed question in the statement of the accused. Transferred by the complainant's lawyer without the consent of the public prosecutor, who was in charge of the matter under Section 493, the sanction of the Public Prosecutor was against the spirit of Section 493, P.C. The revision request was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
