MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. RAJO KHANANI, DISTRICT BADIN
Section 561A Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 494, 34 and 506 During the life of a husband and wife, the joint intention, criminal threats, the wife made the marriage contract with the accused, but he did not The Investigation Officer, who was fully aware of the matter, failed to perform his duties in connection with the Investigation Officer's investigation of the case, even before the invoice was ready. Failure to make the statement of the magistrate, the spouse (co-accused) and the order of the High Court, whereby the respondents, along with the appropriate court investigating officer, May initiate legal action against his wife, he and his wife had to record the co-accused), nkahkuan statements (. Only the Family Court was able to decide whether the marriage registrar was able to reach the correct conclusion of the matter, the question of e-marriage validation, etc. Respondents should refer to Family Court, but they prepared and filed this story with unreasonable intent, a false FIR case was appropriate to withhold the trial because the trial was a continuation of the process. Will be misused. Of the court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
