Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD IQBAL ARSHAD versus WAPDA THROUGH CHAIRMAN, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iii) and removal of 5 Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Pension Rules, 1977, Chapter 1, Serial No. 7, Notes, 1, 2 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appellant claimed to have retired from his position under section 17 (1A), without making any inquiry against the appellant who was dismissed from the service on special charges. The Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act, 1958 and at the time when the order to remove them was approved, but they were no longer in service, such an order was declared invalid, the Authority acknowledged. The competent authority had essentially retired from the job, but they claimed that under the Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Pension Rules 1977 any wrongdoing or commission against the appellant was due within one year. Can be worked during service. The action against the appellant was in accordance with the procedure and no illegal movement was committed by the authority and the appeal filed by the appellant was ineligible before the appellant was ordered to be removed from the job. Had been retired from, such an order would have been inappropriate in any case. The second clause of the Express Note, Serial No.7, Serial No.7, Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Pension Rules 1977, dealing with the situation, shall apply to dealing with all such employees who have retired. Is. Or as a result of a conviction and the justification for the removal of the appellant from the employment by the authority for relying on the rules and regulations under Note 1 best advocate from Lower Dir lawyer