Find a Lawyer

MIRZA AZEEM BAIG versus GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL), PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Appeal to Section 4 Service Employees from employment after inquiry into charge sheet and criminal theft against them. Was removed. The employee was also sued, in which he was acquitted by the criminal criminal court witnesses, who appeared in the department's investigative proceedings against the employee, who did not appear in the criminal court while theft in both proceedings. The allegation was the same, the officer investigating the inquiry department's inquiry proceedings was very relevant when determining the employee's guilt, resulting in the inquiry officer being required to make an accurate inquiry into the employee's guilt. , But his inquiry report shows that he was not very much an employee of the Inquiry Office There is confidence in the disclosures filed against R but there was a valid legal procedure in conducting the inquiry as it had recorded the statement of witnesses and it had also given the employees the right to investigate the witnesses. Showed no flaw in the proceedings except for the slight irregularities which did not affect the inquiry proceedings against him on the grounds that he was removed from the job. Removing the employee from the services rendered, however, was found to be extremely severe, especially when the testimony in the criminal case against him did not result in the termination of the employment, resulting in his retirement. us immigration advocates from Kech lawyer