Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MUNIR CHUGHTAI versus CHAIRMAN, WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE

Sections 3, 5 (4) and 9 (1) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appeal removed from service of appellant who was dealt with the job after issuing a cause notice on his absence. Appeal to the competent authority under the provisions of section 9 (1) of the removal / service, 25 days after the order of his dismissal, the appellant also appealed almost 10 months after the representation / appeal was filed with the service tribunal. Filed Ordinance, 2000 Appellant was required to file representation / appeal against removal order within 15 days which was filed by the appellant and then filed appeal in the service tribunal after considerable delay, when The petition was not filed for contempt of delay, on the question of concessionary delay, it cannot be considered that under ESTACODE, the Appellant Department can file an appeal within six months, because of the provisions of Estacode Were not in compliance with the applicable law and could not be relied upon to file an appeal to the service tribunal under the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 and Russia was the time limit for filing an appeal to the Tribunal. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 cannot repeal the provisions of the Act, the said Act and the Ordinance, and in the presence of this Act, the provisions of the Estacode cannot be made ineffective. \ r \ n power of attorney advocate Balakot lawyer