Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR SHAH versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

Sections 3 and 5 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4 were charged with banning the lower post of the opposition's appeal when the appellant was appointed as an inquiry officer to investigate against these employees. was done. The corporation, it stated the allegations and allegations, said that the accused employee was confused without giving his full details ie name, name of the department and the department was finalized as soon as the inquiry was done under it. Charges have been taken against those who were mistaken in the inquiry. There is no rule against the employees under which the inquiry officer can be prosecuted for any mistake made during the inquiry proceedings. The appellant was also not given an inquiry report against the appellant along with the show cause notice issued which was necessary and cannot be transferred as it would have been defective. Authorities' failure to provide appellant's defense prevented appellant's copy of the inquiry report from responding to a deficiency in the inquiry report in order to show notice of it. jobs for advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer