Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR TIPPU versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE

The Section 13 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the retirement age at the age of 4, appealed to the appellant's complaints from the service tribunal that his birth authority had been changed without cause and that Retired on the land. Instead of filing a constitutional appeal / representation within the stipulated period, by filing a constitutional petition, he has attained the age of the sub-appellant and after dismissing his constitutional application, he applied for leave. Filed. Appealing to the Supreme Court, which was subsequently withdrawn by the appellant, after withdrawing the leave application for appeal, the appellant made his return to the service tribunal more than a year later. An appeal was filed against the complainant, the appellant should have filed an appeal before the service tribunal after terminating his services. Treatment of the Court of Appeals, but it did not make the right judicial choice, the forum also filed a constitutional application to resolve the complaint, which was otherwise ineligible, after a substantial delay in the petition for consolation. Was filed, delay was not given sufficient ground for condolences, the selection of the wrong judicial forum was also no excuse for it. Since the delay was requested because the appellant had not filed the department's appeal, which was irrational to the appeal in the service tribunal, his appeal was not appealable or else it was hopelessly time bound. It was removed. tax advocates from Fateh Jang lawyer