Find a Lawyer

SARWAR ALI SHAIKH versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, ISLAMABAD

Applicants serving as Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Assistant Engineer, shall be charged on the charge sheet after their removal. And was removed from the job after being questioned. On the allegation of slow surveillance and negligence against him, the appellant claimed that he had undergone work under the direct supervision of the Engineer in-charge and the Inspector of Works, but said that two officers were released. And they were not even demanded to be charged. Appellant had a record of 39 years of impaired service, however, and argued that his sentence was too severe. In connection with the applicant's confession that he acted under the direct supervision of his seniors, it could be said that the public servant should follow the written rules and instructions and not the illegal instruction by his elders. Not by the source that was allegedly issued to them, obeying the instructions of seniors can never be a better defense. Disciplinary action Each case had to be decided on its own merits. The gravity of the allegations leveled against the appellant was diminished as it was directly supervised by two of its senior officers, but the competent authority approved the penalty. Given this aspect of the matter did not consider. Appellant prayed for a soft sentence, it would mean that the appellant had admitted the allegations leveled against him, the punishment for dismissal from the job was changed to the compulsory retirement of the appellant. Also, the applicant's b tax advocates from Ghizer lawyer