Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD LASHARI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS

Sections 3, 5 (4) and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the appellant was dismissed from the job after issuing a notice due to his issuance of the job but alleged misconduct by the government. Without regular investigation against it. Funds and Fraud Activities Appellant denies the allegations leveled against him, conducting regular investigations was absolutely necessary, but neither regular investigations nor appellant were given a personal hearing, only a formal inquiry. The employee may be convicted by, but the authority withdrew. An inquiry fact finding inquiry can never be a substitute for a permanent investigation without giving a reason for the showcase notice, and it cannot be used against any of the accused employees for a substantial penalty for dismissal. Directs the authorities to restore the appellant and to hold the de novo dispensary. property advocate from Barkhan lawyer