MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD
Rr 4 (1) (b) (iv) Exclude the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Appellant, who had been serving for 10 years long, on the basis of unauthorized absence from duty only. Was dismissed. It is shown that, if the appellant is absent, the authorities suffered or suffered in any way, only for the unauthorized absence, the dismissal of the employment imposed by the appellant. The huge penalty was severe, and the minor fatalities it produced did not. Appellant's absence amended the offense of dismissing the services rendered to the appellant in which the appellant in the compassionate case of two receipts withheld for a period of two years with no additional effect. As a small employee of the authority. After a long period of absence from the appellant, the tribunal had failed litigation because it could have caused the appellant to be restored. Service
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mian Walli lawyer