Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SAFDAR ABBAS versus MOUR ALIAS GULBAHAR


Sections 148, 149 and 352 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 417 (2A), equipped with deadly weapons, appealed against the common object and the principles of assault or assault by criminal force. No evidence was cited. Be able to stop the argument. The evidence obtained by the trial court was against the principles of appreciation, the verdict imposed by the trial court, while the same cannot be said about the acquittal of the accused. And its reasons were not hypothetical, arbitrary, speculative, and artificial because in the absence of an injunction, such interference with the trial court could not be, as aggravated by the lawyer in the judgment, for reasons. On. And the contradictions referred to the trial court in the disputed judgment were in accordance with the evidence provided during the trial, so the conviction of the accused person was dismissed according to law.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.