Find a Lawyer

NAZEER MOOSA versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

A. XIV, R 5 and Section 100 Additional Issue, when a legal question arises about the status, authority and eligibility of a person's central owner of a property to execute a contract of sale and is not discussed Has been fixed and no problem has been fixed. Then the appeal case falls under the components / foundations of Section 100 of the CPC. The High Court submitted the second appeal by the High Court and the cases were remanded.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• SHUJAAT HASHMI alias SHUJA v. State 2013 MLD 1615
• MUMTAZ ALI v. State 2013 YLR 1619
• Syed AHMED ALI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 MLD 1625
• Mst. NAILA ASHAR v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1627
• SAFDAR ABBAS v. MOUR alias GULBAHAR 2013 YLR 1635
• ISHFAQUE AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 1641
• WASEEM QAZI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Executive District Officer, Revenue, Matiari 2013 CLC 1641
• MUHAMMAD YOUSIF v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1642

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

advocate for immigration from Pasni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes