MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME-I, LAHORE
Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the appellant was dismissed on the basis of absence of duty-authorized authority, while imposing a period of absence from duty imposed a regular period of absence. Applicant's presence was not valid under any law by the competent authority under any law to change the presence of the appellant without any salary; the orders enforced cannot be considered as lawful orders. The appellant was laid off and reinstated in the job, however, the department de novo could stop the proceedings, he was away from the job, considered such a departure.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
