MEHMOOD AHMAD versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB
R 13 18 Appeal for the verification and admission of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4, was upset by the orders of the Service Tribunal appellant, whose representation for admission and admission was made by his temporary / ad hoc. Date will enter Test E. Promotion was rejected on the Validati Police Rule 13 18, no condition was attached to pass the Intermediate Class Course, for the purpose of certification A Section of the Authority I Plea that the Appellant on ad hoc basis till 23 October 1992. Was working, defeating their action. Which Appellant was certified as Section 1, if applicable from 1991, if the Appellant was not certified on ad hoc basis, then he was certified as A Section I till 23 1 1992. This should not mean that the ad hoc promotion appellant was not considered a barrier by the authorities to verify them. The appeal was accepted and the relevant authority to review the appellant's case was obtained on the date of confirmation of the date when it was developed that it was advanced as a Section I subject to the condition. His service record was found satisfactory after two years of development.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Swatmingora lawyer