MST. RIAZ BATOOL versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W-EE) KHUSHAB
Applicants under Sections 3 and 13 Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1999, R4 (1) (b) (iv) removal of employment from Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1999 Major. The action against the department has been launched. Charges of dismissal of employment from Punjab under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 and against them for the intentional absence of duty proceedings under Punjab Government Employees (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1999. They were charged after I inquired against them. Launched against the Appellant in May 2000, under the Punjab Removal Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, in 2003, under the Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, it was expressly stated that All actions are already pending. The ordinance against any public servant under any law or rule shall commence under the said rules, as the whole proceeding under it is, that the matters were void as it was simultaneously with two different sets of rules. Could not be subject to appeal, the appellant was reinstated with all the resulting benefits in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
