Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB HEALTH DEPARTMENT

Section & and (()) the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of section 444), were removed from the job after issuing a notice of dismissal of service appeal with regular inquiry, but were deliberately removed. Regular inquiries were issued on absentee charges. Duty and that he was found to be running a private clinic was considered to be a form of corruption but the authorities did not deny the fact that there was no regular inquiry against the appellant, while against the appellant. He denied the allegations and denied the allegations and the preparation of attendance records. Applicant's formal inquiry into the Basic Health Unit is being guaranteed; no reasonable justification was given by the authorities for issuing regular inquiries in this case. Appellant's signature was present on different dates in the attendance register and Appellant was performing minor duties and signing of different bills on different dates Submit a cause notice D Appellant did not indicate the exact duration of his alleged absence from duty but authorities did not know which As a non-governmental organization, to recommend action against the appellant under the law Was able, when the authority was appointed in the case of the appellant. No complaint was filed against me against the common man's appellant for becoming provincial health department, as the medical officer may be entitled to private practice as a doctor at his residence in the evening, if he is a public quarter. Would not and would not have been occupied. Acceptance without appeal for a practice allowance list of advocates from Kotla lawyer