Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAIF-UR-REHMAN RIZVI versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), LAHORE AND 5 OTHERS

The Advanced Increment Intelligence employee, who was appointed as a teacher in BS9 on Merit in 1985, was later appointed as OT in 1990 before being appointed OT, passed a BA and was subsequently awarded an M.A. He also got the qualification of A and because of this he was allowed three advance increments. An advanced increment for high BA and high MA qualification in 1990 while upgrading from BS9 to BS15 while working as an OT in BS9 Post, five years. The employee who fulfilled the condition of the experience was upgraded to BS. His salary was fixed from 15 to 17 August 1990 in BS 15, which included the benefit of advance increments that employees had already earned in BS 9. I was received on the basis of high qualifications which, after 9 years in the BS15, was on the audit object against the permission of the employee as per the permission of the employee and the advance was also increased. The notice of return received by the employee as a recruitment was presented with another order advance increment as well as upgrades See also Upgrades Employed BS-15 to 1990 BS15 was allowed to work from 1995 instead of 1990 and the employee was asked to return the money he received, even though he was not entitled to advance BS15. Despite which it was upgraded, they certainly deserved a higher qualification, while employees in BS9 were placed in BS 15 17 11 1990, while in BS 9 earlier. Advance increment was allowed on 17 2 1990. Employee's OT's immigration advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer