MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, KASUR
R 4 (1) (a) (ii), (b) (i) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Penalty pay The reason for the reduction of salary by two stages was given to the appellant. After issuing a show cause notice to him that he was absent for 24 days, he said that the penalty on the representation of the department was changed to a one-year increment withheld. Many details of the 24-day absence were reported on the charge of absence of duty authority. Appellant claimed that he was a diabetic and also requested medical leave, the appellant was sent by the DPO to Appellant's Medical Superintendent Pliya that he had properly applied. For medical leave, the record was supported The respondent department did not offer any reason for the cancellation of medical leave, as against the Department of Holiday Rules, 1981 el r \ n \ r \ n The al filed by the appellant was accepted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
