Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AKHTAR GULAB, D.S.P./S.D.P.O., CITY RAHIM YAR KHAN versus D.I.-G. DISCIPLINE, LAHORE

Section 4 Advertising Remarks Expansion Appellant evaluated his performance in serving as D-Division P for the service tribunal appellant recorded in the report that his first counseling officer stated that the Syed Counseling Officer had applied for the appellant. Grading was considered unsatisfactory (poor). And also gave remarks about fitness for promotion as it is likely that there will be no further development. And they described it as corrupt as the primary district attorney. He acknowledged that the report under hearing was for a period of less than three months, and said that according to the instructions for writing AC Rs, the department should have ignored the negative comments. Letter No. S (R) 3542 S&GAD, a performance evaluation report dated 12 2 1968, which cannot be legally recorded and cannot even be considered for loss of appellant's advertising remarks. Will be done. The appellate authority should have overlooked this limitation in deciding the Court of Appeal as there could be no limit to challenging the illegal and invalid order. The negative comment in the AR was deleted. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Takhtbai lawyer