GHULAM JAFFAR versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, TRAFFIC PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) Appellate were dismissed from service by the competent authority, they were summoned for a personal hearing, but they did not appear before the Authority at the specified date and time and the former Action taken. In view of the relevant record as well as the appellant's written response, this charge was proved to be a decision to sue the appellant and to present a personal hearing and defense to the competent authority, giving the appellant a pre-emption decision. Failed to seize the opportunity, concluding that the allegations of illegal indulgence carry some weight and authorities have solid evidence against it. Appellant's dismissal of services, h being so severe, that the pay reduction was changed to a lower level in time scale and that the appellant was reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Machh lawyer
