Find a Lawyer

MRS. NASREEN AKHTAR versus SECRETARY, HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Development of Section 8 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Promotion Appellant Service Tribunal Appellant, who was appointed as the charge nurse in BS 14 in 1981 due to his satisfactory performance. But, as a senior, he was not honored. BS 17, while its junior, stated that the grade appellant was not only appointed for the first respondent, but also had a promotion in BS 16, which was due to his satisfactory performance. As such, pharma on BS 17 was entitled to promotion. Appellant's claim for promotion of pro forma in BS17 on the basis of seniority low fitness could not be dismissed on the basis that his application was timed, because in terms of promotion and salary, The question was not implemented since the promotion date in BS 17 was promoted to the next junior, the authority was directed to consider the applicant's case for development from the next June. To do Ivor was promoted to BS17, the date of development of the Appellant in BS16, along with the decisive factor, will also be a formula of seniority low fitness in due time. list of advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer