Find a Lawyer

MST. SAJIDA SHAFI versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (SE/EE), NAROWAL

After removing the appellant from section 4, sections 3, 5 (4) and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), serving as an elementary school teacher, issued him a show cause notice and preliminary fact on the charge. Was removed from the job after being investigated. He did not have the qualifications required for the Elementary School Teacher's position. He had the required qualification for the Elementary School Teacher's position, while the appellant was only matric. Appellant was accused of being a competent authority. Also managed to order his appointment by deception. Although the Applicant had a Certificate in Computer Program and a Certificate of Punjab Board of Technical Education requiring Vocational Training or Vocational Teachers Training Diploma or `Arabic Extra Certificate ', this will not mean that the Applicant BA, B has the required qualification. Regular inquiries for the post contained in Ed were not made in the app's case, but since the appellant's appointment orders were found to be forged, there was a dire need for regular inquiry into the case even though the appellant's In retaliation proceedings, there may be errors, but invalid orders, which were otherwise valid, could not be retracted. Just the basis of the techniques \ r \ n top advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer