Find a Lawyer

RANA DILSHAD MUHAMMAD AZIZ versus SECRETARY, EXCISF, AND TAXATION, LAHORE

Section 4 and 12 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Appointment / Retirement Date Appellant's Determination of Age, which was incorporated into the service on the basis of matric certificate and other educational certificates, stated that when he was in service On joining, his date of birth in the Matriculation Certificate was 15th 1944 and accordingly entry was made in his service book. The appellant stated that someone had filed a constitutional petition challenging the date of birth of the appellant in his service record claiming that the appellant's date of birth was. 15 1 1941 instead of 15 1 1944 and this appellant retired on the date of birth because 1 1 1941 the original record, especially the Appellant's admission form which he submitted as a candidate in the matriculation examination, showed Did he write his own date as birth? 15 1 1941 The appellant, who could not produce the original matriculation certificate, stated that he had presented his originality. A certificate for appointing authority was also acknowledged by the appellant. Can be accepted because the original educational certificates were always returned by the appointing authorities and only the documents verified Copies were kept on the record because the appellant was deliberately refusing to submit the original certificate, as it had been forged by him. Clearly the fraud should be exposed and when it is discovered, notice can be taken and the facts of the case as well as the actual record presented in the court regarding the date of the appellant's proceedings may begin. , The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by a legal judge top civil advocates from Gambet lawyer