Find a Lawyer

MST. ZAHIDA BASHIR versus DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (SE/EE), NAROWAL

Section 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Appellant, who was serving as Section V Teacher, was removed from the job, issuing show cause notices and mainly against him. Was removed from the job after the inquiry. The position of Section V teachers, as indicated in the relevant advertisement, was BA, BAd, while the appellant was merely a letter of matriculation which was self-made and fake and even ordered transfer. Fake was found, there may have been some legal flaws in the proceedings initiated against the appellant by the competent authority under the provisions of the Punjab Removal Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, but as it turns out Not only was his order of exchange, but his appointment orders were invalid, the unclean order of removal from the approved job against the appellant, The appellant cannot, on the basis of technical skills, not be the one to take advantage of his fake appointment. The appellant could not in any way indicate that he had the requisite qualifications for the position. That if the appellant has the certificate of Arbitrage or Diploma in Vocational Training from the Punjab Board of Technical. Education or certification in vocational training, this will not mean that Chet said qualification is equivalent to a BA, BAd degree, which was set by the rules for publishing. lawer from fb area from Khanewal lawyer