Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ JAVED versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB

R4 (1) (b) (i) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 pay scale reduction appellant, who was serving as Inspector Excise and Taxation. He was sentenced to a reduction in his pay scale. After filing a charge sheet and conducting an inquiry against him for illegally accepting pleas, the appellant explained that the complainant who owed Rs 3500 as property tax was the same in the bank. With the request for a deposit, his money was handed over to him as the complainant did not. The same inquiry officer in his inquiry report himself stated that allegations of illegal pleas against the appellant could not be established during the inquiry report, however, the inquiry officer found the appellant guilty of receiving cash tax. Was what was said. Violation of the proposed law or rules related to this rule was not mentioned in the charge sheet or was not the same as Aga's statement in the indictment immediately because the appellant thought it was a good idea. Applicants could not be prosecuted for illegal financing, but the practice of collecting property tax money for depositing money at the bank, although not guaranteed by law and regulations on the subject, was extensive. The appellant in the department correctly pointed out that while imposing penalties for reduction of salary on a scale, neither the period for which the lower scale of pay reduction was punished, the so-called Was done in order, and law firms from Kunjah lawyer