Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASEEN, EX-EXCISE AND TAXATION INSPECTOR versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB

Section 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), while removing the Section 4 Service Appellant from the Appellant, were posted as Excise and Taxation Inspector in respect of the Tractor Appellant in connection with the misuse of registration fees and bogus registration papers. The allegations against the preparation were taken. Appellant was removed from his job after an inquiry was filed against him for some complaints raised against him, incompetent, corrupt and corrupt, and the appellant failed to defend himself and he Appearing directly and indirectly to the irregularities, the appellant also showed his readiness. There was no evidence or any compelling basis for establishing his innocence during the regular investigation for alleged payment of registration fees, etc. in connection with various vehicles, which were not submitted by him to the Government Treasury Appellant. Was the only allowance that could be granted. The length of his employment for the appellant was about 25 years and the fact that the appellant had deposited the disputed amount of registration fees etc. in the public treasury, in view of such an aspect of the matter when rehabilitating. Appellant's prayer was dismissed, it was ordered that the punishment for dismissal from the employment be punished. The mandatory retirement has been changed and will be amended according to the unplanned orders immigration advocates contact from Multan lawyer