ABDUL WAHID SHAIKH AND OTHERS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
The Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 4 Promotion Appeal Service Tribunal consisted of three appellants who were MC (Zoology) and one who was MC (Botany), at the plant through the Federal Public Service. I was selected as the Plant Quarantine Inspector. Three respondents from the Department of Protection, who received a Bachelor of Agriculture degree (BC), were also selected / appointed by the Federal Public Service Commission at the same position as Plant Quarantine Inspector in BPS16. It was said that the three respondents were approved in the BPS 17 notification, while the appellants, who were elderly, were not given BPS. Specialists in Plant Pathology / Ann with BCC (Entomology / Agriculture in Plant Pathology or Agriculture with MCC (Zoology / Botany)) Tomology Respondents Although appellant was a junior, he was a BC (Honors). ) Had a Bachelor of Agriculture degree, while the Appellant belonged to the MC (Zoology / Botany), which was not considered equivalent to the BC (Lion / Agriculture) .Mc Agriculture or BSc (Lion) in Agriculture and Appellant. None of them had the degree of MC (Zoology / Botanical) Appellant, advertising was considered equivalent to plain BC agriculture, while BC (ON) Z) Agriculture respondents have had a definite BCC agriculture better than the fact that the degree of MC (Zoology / Botany) was not equivalent to BC (Hons) agriculture, the Higher Education Commission and the response of three universities. Was fully endorsed by the operators, in the circumstances it should have been right.BP section 17 and the appellants were given, none of them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
