Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ALI ZAIDI versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Sections 3, 5 and 11 of the Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 4 (1) (b) (ii) and 5 (1) (ii) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4 Under the Compulsory Retirement Appeal Major Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, the disciplinary action was taken against the appellant and he was fined at his expulsion. Special Powers (the Ordinance, 2000 was already enforced due to the misuse of law; the entire retaliation proceedings against the Appellant and the imposition of a fine, declared illegal and void, the Service (Special Powers) ) According to the Ordinance, Section 11 of the Removal from 2000, all other existing laws relating to disciplinary action against delinquent employees were repealed, thereby separating the contaminated order of mandatory retirement from the approved job against the appellant. Was made on the basis of these allegations against the appellant under the provisions of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 Accordingly, it was restored to service with directive to initiate disciplinary proceedings against De Nauv within a difficult period. advocates from Sangote lawyer