MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD.
Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotion Intelligence Appellants have been working as telephone operators (BPS8) from different dates to enable some appellants to be able to develop in BPS 11 One Telephone. Graduate and some were intermediate and terms of experience. The operator was eventually promoted through the court to BPS 11, after which the appellant approached the department to consider them for development as the claims of the appellants were rejected by the authority. , The appellants had filed an appeal before the service tribunal which issued various notifications in connection with the promotion. Employees of the department provided rules with employee promotional rules provided that the telephone operator in BPS 8 could be allowed to develop if he / she had a four-year clean service or a one-year service rule with Intermediate. Allows development from BPS 11 operators who were in BPS 8 & 10 provided they have four years of unpaid service with Intermediate or Graduate one year service provided by Syed Rollz. Posts for telephone operators in PS11 were available to telephone operators throughout the department whether they were Overseas Trunk X Working enzymes or was it directed the department to examine the issue of appellant. Those who have the required qualifications and experience will consider them for development in BPS 11 in the stipulated period. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Alipur lawyer